|

This
is a suggested backup strategy for Employers dealing with the
risk of Contractor Insolvency.
Because
the construction industry is built on contract chains the insolvency
of one link will impact on the contractual performance of others.
Employers, just like banks do, or did, should therefore be looking
for the early warning signs of financial difficulty.
When
it comes to the valuation and certification process, if there
is the slightest hint of insolvency, an Employer would be wise
not to include on and off site materials that have not yet been
incorporated into the Works and therefore into an interim payment.

Liquidation,
Administrative Receivership, Voluntary Arrangements and Administration
are some of the names you will be familiar with.
Liquidation:
Compulsory
Under
this process the Company is divested of all of its assets which
are in turn distributed to its creditors and members according
to an order of priority payment. In a compulsory liquidation no
proceedings against the company are allowed without the Court’s
permission.
Liquidation:
Compulsory
Voluntary
liquidation under Section 165 (3) of the Insolvency Act 1986 gives
the Liquidator the power to trade for the beneficial winding up
of the Company as may be necessary; a Liquidator may therefore
trade and may decided to complete on going contracts. No such
power arises in a compulsory liquidation without Court sanction
(Section 167 of the Insolvency Act 1986).
In
practice if ongoing trading is possible, the Liquidator is likely
to apply for an administration order.
The
role of a Liquidator is therefore wholly limited to selling the
Company’s assets and collecting debts on completed contracts,
by institution of legal proceedings if necessary.
Administrative
Receivership
This
is normally following an appointment by a Bank under the terms
of its floating charge. The use of this secured creditor remedy
has been greatly restricted as a result of the Enterprise Act
2002. The appointment of a Administrative Receiver by a Bank is
about the Bank recovering its lending without regard to much else.
Administration
An
Administrator may be appointed by the Court or by the holder of
a qualifying floating charge and by the company or its directors.
In
practice most administrators are appointed by the company.
The
primary purpose of administration is to rescue the company as
a going concern. The process is intended to last for 12 months
but it can be extended.
The
secondary purpose is to achieve a better result for the company’s
creditors than would be likely on a winding up. If that does not
prove possible the Administrator can aim to realise the company’s
assets (frequently by sale to its directors) and make a distribution
to its creditors.
Legal
proceedings can only be commenced or continued against the company
with the consent of the administrator of the permission of the
Court (paragraph 43 Schedule B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986).
This
can give the company some breathing space to recover, where in
other circumstances it might face a series of claims, each taking
resources away from work on other contracts which might themselves
result in claims against the company. Administration is popular
in the construction industry.
Voluntary
Arrangements
This
is a Court approved procedure where the company puts proposals
to creditors for the repayment, or partial repayment, of the debts
owed by it. It is a contract to deal with debt on terms. If the
proposal is accepted by a majority of 75% of creditors, (all of
the creditors are prevented from bringing any legal proceedings
to recover the debt), but not any future debts which would fall
outside the scope of the Arrangement.
There
is no requirement that the company be or about to be insolvent
and frequently the company will continue trading paying a percentage
of its monthly income to its creditors over a period of time typically
between 3 to 5 years.

Once
you hear the contractor has gone “bust” your foremost
concern is to get another contractor on site, to get the work
completed. What you will want is a smooth transition from the
insolvent contractor to the replacement contractor. To do this
the Employer will need to have some knowledge of the insolvency
regime in place and of legal issues which are specific to construction
contracts.
Immediate
steps
Immediate
steps an Employer should take to protect its position and to mitigate
the consequences of the insolvency include:
1...To
establish the type of insolvency;
2...Notify
all relevant parties including insurers and funders;
3...Secure
the site, including all plant equipment and materials on it;
4...Cease
all payments to any parties until legal advice on payment obligations
has been obtained;
5...Prepare
an auditable financial statement of payments made (and due) to
the contractor and the status of any outstanding work;
6...Ensure
that there are no breaches of its own employer obligations under
the building contract;
7...Reviewing
the terms of the building contract and any rights of set-off and
performance bond or guarantee terms.
What
next
Once
appointed the Insolvency Practitioner will push for payment but
the Employer should be certain of its legal position before making
any agreement. The Employer may have set-off rights which can
be exercised along with security or guarantees which can be called
upon to improve its position.
As
to the completion of unfinished works, the Employer may have several
options to choose from. These will include:
1...To
novate the Building Contract to a new contractor;
2...To
send the Works out to tender;
3...To
complete the Works from its own resources;
4...To
enter into direct agreement with sub-contractors to complete the
Works either through the exercise of step-in rights or by reaching
a new agreement;
5...To
allow the insolvent contractor to complete the Works through reaching
an agreement with the Insolvency Practitioner. (This will occur
if the amount of the outstanding works is relatively minor. The
Insolvency Practitioner will want paying for this).
An
Employer can think about these options in advance; the commercial
decision will be driven by a concern to save time or money.

Materials
Upon
notification of the Contractor’s Insolvency, the Employer
should take immediate steps to secure the site and materials on
it. A Contractor (or Supplier) may have a residual license to
enter the site, so removing goods may not amount to trespass.
It is better from the Employer’s perspective to be arguing
over whether it should release or pay for goods rather than trying
to get them back.
By
operation of law, title to materials vests in the owner of the
land once they have been attached to the land through incorporation
to the Works regardless of any retention of title clauses.
Use
of plant and equipment
The
ownership and use of plant and equipment is a less clear position.
In the event of contractor insolvency many building contracts
provide an Employer with rights over the contractor’s plant
and equipment including the right to use it and sell it.
If
the Employer simply wishes to use the plant and equipment to complete
the Works then it will be possible if the terms of the Building
Contract allow it. If however, the terms of the Building Contract
include a power of sale this will almost certainly amount to a
floating charge.
In
order to rely on the right of sale to show that the plan was given
a security, an Employer must have registered the charge under
Section 870 of the Companies Act 2006 within 21 days of the signing
of the Contract. (See Smith Administration of Coslett (Contractors)
Limited V Bridgend County Borough Council [2000] 1 ALL ER 292.)
Some
building contracts automatically terminate on the insolvency of
one of the parties. Others give the insolvent party the right
to terminate the Building Contract within a reasonable period
of time of the insolvency.
Where
the Building Contract does not terminate automatically or provide
the Employer with a discretionary right to determinate the contract,
the Employer must rely on other terms in the contract to terminate.
This will leave him in the position of having to find a breach
which flows from one of the practical consequences of the insolvency,
rather than the insolvency itself,for example, the failure to
complete the Works.
Set-off
The
rules on the manner in which set-off will apply will depend on
which type of insolvency has occurred. The Employer would be wise
therefore not to make any payments once the Contractor has gone
into insolvency in case they can be set-off and to obtain legal
advice on the applicability of the relevant rules.
The
general rule in liquidation is that the parties own contractual
agreements as to set-off arrangements are replaced by mandatory
set-off (Rule 4.90) of the Insolvency Rules 1986 (as amended)
which requires for the set-off of the mutual dealings.
If
the Administrator gives notice of the intention to make a distribution
to creditors, the same set-off regime will apply as in liquidation
pursuant to Rule 4.90.
A
company in voluntary arrangement can expressly modify the common
law rights of set-off.
Performance
bonds
The
major problem with performance bonds, in the event of insolvency
is that some contracts do not equate insolvency with constituting
a “breach”. Therefore the surety may have no liability
to pay out on the Bond until completion of the Works and settlement
of the account.
In
practice, where there is a Bond, the Employer should consider
carefully the instances which allow the Bond to be called in and
ensure that the contract has not been terminated or determined
before it attempts to do so.
Direct
payments
Many
standard forms make provision for an Employer to make direct payment
to a sub-contractor where the Main Contractor is insolvent, but
the general view is that it is unwise because the practice contravenes
the insolvency rules. (See British Eagle International Airlines
Limited V Compagnie Nationale Air France (1975) 1 WLR 758)
On
the liquidation of the company all the unsecured creditors have
to be treated equally, direct payments to nominated sub-contractors
put them in a privileged position – but do nothing to diminish
the Employer’s responsibility to make outstanding payments
to the Liquidators or Administrator of the insolvent company.
So
although the JCT Contracts indicate a direct payment may be made,
a prudent Employer may choose never to make one less it should
find itself liable to pay twice.
|